"Why should Tottenham accept a low offer for Harry Kane?!" | Michael Bridges' rant on Kane saga

SUBSCRIBE ► http://bit.ly/SSFootballSub
PREMIER LEAGUE HIGHLIGHTS ► http://bit.ly/SkySportsPLHighlights2122
Michael Bridges shares a passionate point on why Tottenham shouldn't sell Kane to Manchester City for anything less than his true value. #GoodMorningTransfers

Watch Premier League LIVE on Sky Sports here ► http://bit.ly/WatchSkyPL
►TWITTER: https://twitter.com/skysportsfootball

►FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/skysports
►WEBSITE: http://www.skysports.com/football

MORE FROM SKY SPORTS ON YOUTUBE:
►SKY SPORTS FOOTBALL: http://bit.ly/SSFootballSub
►SKY SPORTS BOXING: http://bit.ly/SSBoxingSub
►SKY SPORTS CRICKET: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket
►SOCCER AM: http://bit.ly/SoccerAMSub
►SKY SPORTS F1: http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1
►SKY SPORTS: http://bit.ly/SkySportsSub
►SKY SPORTS GOLF: https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf

Noticias relacionadas:

100+ comentarios:

Cal
Cal:
Imagine getting laughed at by your colleagues for actually being good at your job
London Dazza
London Dazza:
How dare they laugh n mock Michael Bridges for being the only one with a real passionate take on the situation from an actual spurs fan
Hee Hee
Hee Hee:
Get more people with actual passion for the game like this guy. It’s refreshing
Matthew Woodham
Matthew Woodham:
If only there were 25 hours in a day, then Sky Sports could report on this story for a bit longer.
sean j
sean j:
Breaking News: because city are refusing to buy kane, sky news has decided to bid for kane themselves
Stone Cold
Stone Cold:
Wow. A Sky pundit actually showing some passion and giving their true opinion.
Top Hattington
Top Hattington:
Unfortunately, the point being made doesn't suit Sky's agenda, which has been (for several years now) that Harry Kane should leave Tottenham. It is too big of a news story for it not to happen, which is why they have spent so much of this transfer window pushing this story even when nothing was actually happening. It's why Harry's agent gave them the inside scoop on him not turning up to training (unless anyone honestly thinks there just happened to be a Sky journalist ready outside the training ground ahead of the story coming out) and gave them the golf course interview. Kane's camp knew Sky are invested in seeing this deal happen.
They want Kane to go to City, the pundits at Sky (most of whom played for or support Spurs' rivals) want him to go to City and they've done their best to ensure all of us want it to happen as well.
I'm not a Spurs supporter, but the way Sky have acted here is just sad and it's good to see someone at Sky challenge this idea that Tottenham are the bad guys for not just rolling over and letting another PL club take their best player.
Hasan Ameeri
Hasan Ameeri:
Sky has officially become agent for harry Kane
Yang Inhyeok
Yang Inhyeok:
Next up in sky sports: possible breakfast menus Kane might eat for the upcoming weekend
mexrider1
mexrider1:
Well said Michael. Said the truth. Refreshing to hear especially on SKY
sFGilly
sFGilly:
Why the hell are these other highly forgettable presenters mocking Michael Bridge for showing a bit of passion and frustration towards the way his colleagues in the media are spinning this story? Embarrassing broadcasting, the main presenter is slouched on his seat with one too many buttons awkwardly undone and not a comment. We need more Michael Bridges on TV
Radboudt L
Radboudt L:
This man speaking straight FACTS
Bhasty 1
Bhasty 1:
Well said! I honestly wish him well. He deserves to be in a winning team but I honestly don't think, sadly enough that Spurs are going to win any big silverware with or without him!
Sam
Sam:
That guy is so passionate. Got more love for football and knowledge than the other 2 blokes combined.
Totspur 63
Totspur 63:
Michael is 100% correct. If I were Levy I would add £1000000 to the asking price every day until the right offer arrives.
le kloon
le kloon:
Well done Michael, making the rest of the sky sports presenters look like the predictable robots they tend to be. Very condescending from your colleagues
Tune23k Kganyago
Tune23k Kganyago:
There is a great chance that Man City wont bid that amount of money for him, reason being there's a younger version of him in the Bundesliga( Erling Haaland) with a big room for development that Man city can bid for in the year to come. Man city has more than enough of a squad to manage one more year without a striker.
Rashid Conteh
Rashid Conteh:
As for me, Kane can stay in Spurs and end up his career there. He is a good striker and I think spurs can keep him. City already have a plan B and I think it's going to help City a lot....
EiJi Lee
EiJi Lee:
Kane or his agent fault for not adding release clause etc.. Sky should just give the extra 40mil to City since its "not much", they make it sound like 100mil is little money
unstoppableExodia
unstoppableExodia:
I don’t love tortnam but I have to respect Bridgey’s passion when talking about the Harry Kane situation. He sums the situation up very succinctly and his cohosts want to laugh but really sky just want him to help improvise more inane and speculative banter to keep the non stop chatter about it up to eat up as much air time as possible. And he’s not having it, he’s just telling it like it is leaving them little to talk about until new details emerge tha could indicate one way or another if he will actually move.
Berri
Berri:
Levy has zero pressure right now to sell Kane, we're stable financially, Kane has a long term contract and City are frankly being insulting with their bids.
anandban
anandban:
gotta respect the passion. Sometimes they just have bland personalities.
HTO Half Time Oranges Football Podcast
HTO Half Time Oranges Football Podcast:
Absolutely NOT! He signed that 6 year deal knowing EXACTLY What could happen to Spurs over that time. He has completely done this to himself and now he is throwing his toys out the pram. Spurs should milk every drop of sterling they can get for him and send him there without being match fit.
Carlos Tony
Carlos Tony:
He’s right though
Daniel doesn’t need accept a cheaper price to what he values Kane. At the end of the day Man City want him
W
W:
The Spurs fan is the only one worth listening to, the other presenters are cringeworthy robots. Kane will stay at Tottenham probably but honestly its boring at this point
DAWSON237
DAWSON237:
Honestly the agenda sky sports have against Kane and Tottenham is unreal, next we will get updates on what Kane has eaten for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner
Lost Liberty 99
Lost Liberty 99:
I like that guy. Bring him back IMO.
Bob Klee
Bob Klee:
Depends on the financial situation for Spurs. Man City can go elsewhere, Who else will be in the market at £100m + ? Daniel Levy has to keep the club afloat, he needs to sell in next week if he’s going to sell him and maximise the price.
Naim Iman
Naim Iman:
We need more passionate fans and honest opinions from sky sports. This is brilliant 👍.
OllieSutton
OllieSutton:
This is the only person so far thats actually had a decent opinion on the Harry Kane move
Lewis
Lewis:
Well said, Man City need to pay up or go away.
Greg Krojac
Greg Krojac:
Michael Bridges - Nail. On. Head! 👏👏👏
Jake Thompson
Jake Thompson:
I think city should spend anything. Would massively help Grealish as well. Would take the pressure off him
RAZRgameZ
RAZRgameZ:
Love this guy... He's so correct. We agreed he can go this season if a bid comes in that reflects his value. We're not saying he's not for sale.. He is.. But for the right price.
James Hunter
James Hunter:
This guy is talking a whole load of sense. Almost a first considering the tripe the likes of GNev comes out of
Textured Music.
Textured Music.:
Sky this is the best video I’ve seen of your in a while, honestly congratulations. I’ve given you stock lately I think we all have. This guy speaking complete sense!
Israel
Israel:
City won’t buy Kane, this isn’t the first time city abandoned a big player Cus they think he’s overpriced. Dias Koulibaly deal last year is an example. Sanchez deal is another
Kimberli Artist
Kimberli Artist :
Viewer: Clapping emoji - standing ovation

Bridges: I don't do it for that _proceeds to burst of laughing_

What a guy! Love to see it
mhtbfecsq1
mhtbfecsq1:
Wow a sky reporter sticking up for spurs for once
ItchyFeet
ItchyFeet:
Spurs know that if they keep a player that is not happy then it is very hard for them to get him to play at is best if he is not in the right frame of mind.
CYLop
CYLop:
"Wow ... Michael Bridges has had his weetabix this morning"

What's that presenter on about? God forbid someone shows a bit of passion on Sky Sports.
Johnny Cotton
Johnny Cotton:
He's not going anywhere the club holds all the cards
Zac Sayer
Zac Sayer:
Fair play Michael Bridge, fair words spoken assertively. A balance to all of these embarrassingly biased comments from his Sky Sports Football colleagues who are posing as honest, professional journalists! What a joke too many of them have been through this Harry Kane saga!
Jackie Treehorn
Jackie Treehorn:
Can you imagine the uproar if a man was sniggering about the Passion of a woman behind her back?
Olayinka Giwa
Olayinka Giwa:
Is Michael Bridge running for Prime Minister? Love the passion.
Miok
Miok:
If city spent 100 million on Jack Grealish to spend more time at the hair solon then scoring goals then Spurs can demand 200 Million for Kane.
Chris Harris 87
Chris Harris 87:
Let’s be honest 30 million is enough anything more it’s just ludicrous,Look at City who just spent 100 million on grelish is just stupid he’s not worth that
Emma
Emma:
The power isn't all with Levy though. He has the ability to lower his asking price but Man City could up their offer to what the valuation of Kane is is they really want to. They just spent 100m on Grealish so of course no club is going to give them any discounts.
Pj Mathison
Pj Mathison:
finally someone on sky sports making sense
Sashah Soheili
Sashah Soheili:
When Gareth Bale, Dimitar Berbatov and Luka Modric all wanted to leave, Chelsea would have liked to buy them, but we Spurs don't deal with Major London Rivals. So levy kept them for another year, and he sold them to Real Madrid and Manchester United for a higher transfer fee.
Steven Taylor
Steven Taylor:
If you have to say “how good a player is” 4 times then he’s not very valuable around the world.. aka outside of England
Sam
Sam:
Not sure why there were laughing at him. Refreshing to see some actual passion as opposed to the same cookie-cutter lines we hear every day
Gregg w
Gregg w:
A pundit comes out and speaks the truth about the situation and all the other little sky melts just giggle and laugh.
Jonathan Smith
Jonathan Smith:
Big up Michael Bridges✊🏿
Sir Blessed
Sir Blessed:
City have already entered the race to sign Vlahovic as a potential Harry kane replacement as levy is in no mood to sell him.
Acc to Italian media outlets, city have an 80 mill bid ready for Vlahovic which is the highest bid that has come for Vlahovic so far.
Mahlatse Mashile
Mahlatse Mashile:
City must pay what Spurs wants
G, R,
G, R,:
I agree with Tottenham's stance but I while i think Harry Kane is a fantastic forward, I can understand MCFC hesitation in paying 150mm. My big worry is his Winter ankle injury record which i think will get worse.I think that Spurs need to wonder how much he will be worth over the next two years, if his injuries accumulate and he can't play regularly.
Caine Doherty
Caine Doherty:
Kane is staying with spurs i know this for a fact it was media stunt as the world was talking Messi the prem wanted to be talked bout to
Fraser
Fraser:
Wow, after 9mins they said nothing.

Just repeating themselves from the other 20 bids theyve done on Kane
thomas owen
thomas owen:
Kane getting punished for thinking spurs were actually going to invest and win trophies 😂 😂
He should have known better 😂
Jarmo Haapala
Jarmo Haapala:
It's just negotations. Weird to take it so personally when you supposed to be a neutral pundit. Wouldn't be the first transfer which don't materialise because the difference of valuations. Hardly worth of rant. That's football business for you.
MHS.123Jannath
MHS.123Jannath:
I loves that, it’s showed passion about football
Craig Wythe
Craig Wythe:
This whole transfer window has been about unsettling Harry Kane, so the end game was always to get Kane for less money. Levy does not have to sell. In 3 years time he will be going on a free to Burnley
Enrico Awe
Enrico Awe:
Sky sports thinks levy will budge but he ain't until he gets what he wants..
Pocket Rocket
Pocket Rocket:
Kane isn't worth £150mill so it isn't a discount. I could say "to me, my house is worth £150mill" doesn't mean the insurance would pay that if it burnt down
nest face
nest face:
Go on bridge. Top man good to see u doing well
kearnsy kearnsy
kearnsy kearnsy:
Go on Michael you tell them son loved that
Jonas Loïc
Jonas Loïc:
RESPECT MICHAEL BRIDGE
shikhar govil
shikhar govil:
have'nt seen even one second of video and i wo'nt. seems like SKY is doing more work than what kane's agent will be doing regarding transfer. i am pretty sure that his agent is also watching sky's videos to decide what to do and what not to do.
Damion Thompson
Damion Thompson:
What a professional 👏 👌
Anfieldtheplacetobe
Anfieldtheplacetobe:
We got Salah, Firminio, Mane and Jota for about the same amount😂😂

Well played city👏🏽👏🏽
Joe Barnes
Joe Barnes:
Damn someone finally talking sense about it.
Grassroots Football
Grassroots Football:
I agree with Michael bridges.. spurs should get what they're owed
Jason Goddard
Jason Goddard:
Michael bridges fantastic 👏
OriginalNoseBleed
OriginalNoseBleed:
Sky Sports; we've milked Grealish and got the transfer through, now let's move onto Kane
Mr ShadowMovement
Mr ShadowMovement:
Agreed mr bridges your right i share the same view especially because he is world class category. I am sure me and other spurs fans would prefer him to go abroad but with the current financial climate overseas then what can we do if he wants to go under contract. It is either put or shut up!
packerd00
packerd00:
Tottenham needs to fight for everything they can get. Don't do Man City a favor.
Hlokomani Khondlo
Hlokomani Khondlo:
Bridges is a legend
Trafford Tanner
Trafford Tanner:
I agree with Michael. Why should Harry be handed to City on a silver platter? The only thing City should be handed freely are more defeats after dominating games. Kudos to Nuno too.
Bill Bob
Bill Bob:
About time someone at sky talks sense 👏🏼👏🏼
Rafen Mambwe
Rafen Mambwe:
If City want Kane they need to open up their check book and write a big check! It’s a no brainer. I don’t like levy but in this situation he has to do what’s best for the club, Hazard had 1 year left on his contract and Chelsea told Madrid to PAY up or go home! I know it hasn’t worked out for him so he should come home
Chip Marley
Chip Marley:
Kane signed a long contract basically a gents agreement on paper.
So why should an alleged verbal gents agreement supersede the one he signed.
Barry Boother
Barry Boother:
Yes bridge we like your passion
R M
R M:
The guy with the red shirt just said they might be looking into other places to strengthen ... Like central defender ..🤔
Mysterious Gamer
Mysterious Gamer:
I think the minimum money for harry should be 135 with add ons that 120? Bid was disrespecting you can pay 100 mil for a guy who betrayed his country and dives as much as neymar and you are saying that you cannot pay 150 mil for a worldclass striker and playmaker of the year
Danny din
Danny din:
NO player is bigger than a club. We will sell him only for 150mil pounds or more
E Jaganjac
E Jaganjac:
Sky going through AFTV rant route I see. Dude even gave us screwface 😆😆🙄
Absie1983 Ahead
Absie1983 Ahead:
So if Kane leaves Spurs will replace him with more than one player? Does that mean they will be allowed to play with 12 players?
Creus Anthony Rodrigues-Rodney
Creus Anthony Rodrigues-Rodney:
Pep should've bought kane before they even considered grealish. But he so obsessed with midfielders that he paid 100 mil for grealish and I don't blame levy for wanting 175mil for kane.
Tinotenda Jakazi
Tinotenda Jakazi:
What's a 'fair value' for Kane? He's world class on a long contract, but also considering injury risk, little sell on value, covid economy and it sounds like he clearly does not want to be at Spurs. Is keeping an unhappy player who no longer feels motivated at Spurs not a big risk?
No photo found
No photo found:
It’s like watching a scripted reality show.
JohneeFizter Bottom
JohneeFizter Bottom:
Harry Kane got an ankle injury going through this transfer saga
Richard Beck
Richard Beck:
Fair play to bridges. If Tottenham haven't received a bid they think is enough then why sell him. If city want him that bad then stump up the cash. I think Kane is world class but if I was City I would be looking at haaland, Mbappe or even dybala. Think more likely to get one of those deals over the line
ProdByWalkz
ProdByWalkz:
Lmao 150 million is low? What’s don talking about?
Boaty McBoatface
Boaty McBoatface:
He's getting pretty wound up there... I think he's the only one by this time.
Corrie Douse
Corrie Douse:
Why would you want to keep a player who doesn’t want to stay. Toxic
Jason Morris
Jason Morris:
He will not be the same player if he stays as he wants to leave
Dyego José Ferreira
Dyego José Ferreira:
Imagine being that passionate for a c tier team like Spurs
Ib f
Ib f:
They literally repeated the same thing 20 times over
BabsW
BabsW:
Levy will be making a huge mistake if he doesnt sell Kane this summer for £100-120m. Kane's value will only go down.